Gun Mag Warehouse

Gun Magazine Articles: Business Advertisements?

I have been studying gun publications on and off for two decades and have arrived at the conclusion that gun articles are merely thinly-veiled ads for the industry. At one point, I fell to seven monthly gun publications at once for 6 years. It had been in this six year period, I began to notice some interesting problems in the gun articles I read and I’d want to get on my soap box and have them off my chest.

I held and read gun magazine because I’m very interested in rifles and handguns and have subscribed to and traded many over a twenty year period. I fell to and browse the gun magazines to get knowledge, and check out experts with more experience then me for advice or recommendations. Now the writers’ in the gun magazines and the gun magazines themselves try to give the impression they do product evaluations of weapons and other related components. Some even say they’re writing the content specifically to check the gun or ammunition for your visitors benefit.

Now right back in school, when you said you were planning to do a test and analysis, that required specific standards to make sure that the results weren’t unfounded, but were valid and repeatable. Now, the only way to offer results with any truth is proper ‘research design.’ Un-less the assessment process provides barriers against any unknown variables, specialist prejudice and maintains constant practices, the complete procedure and results are useless. Good re-search design isn’t that difficult and can be achieved with slightly planning. Regrettably the gun writers usually come on-the first step.

For example, gun writers often begin a test and evaluation report by saying that a particular gun was mailed to them for assessment by the manufacturer so they grabbed what ever ammunition was available or called an ammunition manufacturer for some more free ammunition. You will recognize straight away that there’s already inconsistency in the ammunition tried, and a possible conflict of interest in the results if you consider this for one minute. Ammunition is a critical element in how in how a gun performs.

A 230 grain.45 caliber cartridge from Winchester isn’t exactly like a 230 grain.45 caliber cartridge from Golden Saber. A given tube consists of several elements like the dust, bullet, metal case and primer. An alteration in any one element can drastically influence the performance and accuracy of the bullet. Also, when the gun writer calls up an ammunition company and needs free ammunition, there is a conflict of interest here. Can I trust the gun author to provide an honest analysis to me of the tubes performance? Does the business end sending him free ammunition, if h-e provides negative review? Could you give free material to some one who gave you a negative review annually ago?

Furthermore, should you test Gun A with a 5 different brands of bullets of various weights and types and then compare it to your test of Gun B with different brands of ammunition of different weights and types, is the comparison valid? I usually believe it is amusing that they give an impression of wanting to be serious and precise once the basis study design testing process is indeed problematic, the outcomes aren’t valid.

The gun articles also often you need to be mainly smoke parts in place of concise and comprehensive reviews of the product. I guess and usually decide to try in what passage the author will in actuality start to immediately discuss the solution or what the thesis of this article is. In a tiny group of writers, I might find the actual beginning of the article in the second or third paragraph, but also for the most gun writers I find the actual article starts in the 10th or more paragraph. The first ten lines were personal view on living, the shooting publics’ views of hand guns or some Walter Mitty desire of being in a dangerous position where you could count on the product that is the matter of the article.

Next time you read a gun article read it from the point of view of a great manager. Does the writer tell me what the object of the article is in the very first sentence, and produce a position or belief? How much actual relevant information directly associated with the product is in the article versus filler and nonsense about other matters. If you hi-light in yellow the facts and tips of the article you will be surprised how much gel there’s and how much text you can remove and make the article better. and shorter

I have even read some articles where the author even states they only received the gun and were excited to try the gun quickly. So they grabbed what ever ammunition was available and went to the product range. Some even say they didn’t have a particular company or the type they preferred at home so they couldn’t test the gun with that ammunition.

At this time you’ve to laugh. When I read statements like this I find myself saying for the article ‘Then go get some’! or ‘Delay the test before the desired ammunition can be had.’ Duh!

Then when the authors gets to the range each of them test fire the guns differently. Even writers for the same magazine don’t have similar assessment methods. They check at different temperatures, benches, and gun rests. Some will test with Ransom Rests and some do not. The best laughs I get are from the writers who refer to them-selves as old geezers with poor vision. After acknowledging their bad eyesight, then they check out throw the gun for accuracy and give an impression on how well the gun shot!

Now, I don’t find out about you, but I’d not want my new gun to be assessed by some self defined person with bad eye sight, if I was a gun maker. Moreover the magazines themselves should try to identify some testing protocols and younger photographers to accomplish the testing.

Now following the shooting at the-range, the author says the gun shoots effectively and then describes his six shots in to a 4-inch circle at 2-4 yards or some similar collection. Okay, I am thinking, what does this 4-inch team symbolize, provided the inconsistency in assessment methods? Is this 4-inch group due to the good or bad ammunition, the guns inherent accuracy/inaccuracy or the shooters bad eyesight or all three? If all three factors are involved, what does the 4 inch team really represent?

Lastly, after reading countless articles, I can not actually recall reading a write-up where the writer said the gun was a bad style, wouldn’t recommend it, and that the final was bad. Also on guns that are on the lower end of the product line or are from manufactures that make junk guns, no negative reviews, if deserved, are ever given. Especially if the accuracy resembles more of a shot gun pattern, the author often says ‘the gun displayed great fight accuracy.’ Since many shootings arise at about 3 to 8 feet, this means the gun can hit your 30-inch wide enemy at 5 feet away. (I really hope so!) They will not say the gun is just a piece of junk that could not hit a 8-inch target at 15 yards if your life depended on it.

Why? Because the magazines and gun writers don’t choose the guns they test, they get free test types. Only ‘Gun Tests’ magazine buys their very own guns. So the writers have to mention only good things about the gun and down-play concerns, or even the company ‘Black Balls’ them from future guns. The harm is you, the customer. You receive faulty reviews.

How do you trust what-ever the writer is saying? For me personally, I do not. In fact, I more or less let all my subscribers run out years ago, except for American Rifleman.

Now, I read mostly read articles on guns. Not articles selling me on a gun, sight, laser, or specific bullet.

Repetition to Death is also yet another gripe of mine. Through the years, not that lots of truly new gun models have come out. Largely manufacturs’ will issue a preexisting gun with a fresh color, night sights, finish or another minor feature. The trouble could be the gun magazines and writers handle the new gun color as if it is the best thing since sliced bread and produce a four page article. These articles usually are the articles that contain information that is 95% rehash of information already said for decades about the particular gun. Often in these four-page articles only two paragraphs is obviously new information or interesting.

The gun publications also often repeat articles in regards to the same gun in the same year and year after year. The 1911 is an excellent example. Start checking the number of times the model is the subject of articles in every month and gun magazines each. Now the 1911 came out in 1911, and has-been discussing from the time. Is there really something out there as yet not known regarding the 1911? If a new feature on the 1911 is established, does it WARRANT a four page report on a ‘feature’ that could easily be adequately described in several paragraphs?

Only read them with a critical eye, If you like to read gun magazines go-ahead. When I read. I read for content. I try and get the following from an article:

1. What may be the writers’ reason behind writing?

2. What will be the author actually saying?

3. What new information was conveyed?

4. Are the outcome of any assessment process defined valid?

5. Did the author give any back ground skills or experience?

6. What do I remove from the article?

Handguns are high priced, and unfortuitously the magazines aren’t much help in providing an honest evaluation for your beginner. They only say things about all weapons, the and never criticize a brand and or design. ‘They are all good weapons, some are only better then others’? Yes right.

My recommendation to the novice. Keep in touch with a person who has been shooting for awhile and has shot and held a variety of different weapons, and has no vested interest advocating one product or brand.

More details are available here.

These are merely my ideas, but after years of studying the gun articles, I’ve arrived at the conclusion that the writers do perhaps not learn how to do regular testing, and the authors have very low standards for accepting articles. I love shooting and am not great either, but I would not say every PMAGs in stock is really a quality gun or deserves to be purchased.

Gun Magazines

The Magpul Compact/Type Restricted (CTR for short) is another one of the PMAG stock offerings. The stock may be a bit heavier than other shares available, but at. 57lbs, I don’t think you’re likely to have to spend any extra time in the gym bulking up as a result of this thing. The CTR is a simple drop-in alternative to the typical stocks. So, if you do decide to purchase it, just put it on and go. The CTR, like every one of the other Magpul shares. Can be obtained for both mil-spec and commercial-spec pipes. Speaking of, does anybody know why they make 2 different diameters? Just seems to do nothing besides confuse people. Anyway, The CTR includes a sleek A-frame design. That A-frame looks great for avoiding snags which often seems to occur. The release lock to regulate the stock forward and aft is protected by the design, unlike the standard carbine shares. This may prevent inadvertent activation.

This stock, and I think all the Magpul shares, include a friction lock. Now, this friction lock basically solves the issue that’s effects just about all adjustable shares to the mark. It prevents the vibration. Therefore, this stock seems very sturdy and very good quality. So, because this friction lock prevents shake you might argue that it will improve reliability. Now, it will probably, however not to a degree. Therefore, do not expect you’ll be changed into a sniper but buy the CTR Magpul stock. You need the PRS to do that, ha-ha. The higher level polymers which can be used to create this stock allow it to be very sturdy and this stock will tolerate a whole lot more abuse compared to the regular stock. I’m not sure what PMAGs in stock does to their materials, however they are extremely stable and can good coat and emerge with a smile. The stock also comeswith a rubber recoil pad. This mat is most likely more for additional traction than recoil reduction, but in any event it is a good feature. The only real thing that you may be picky about is the added weight. But, for one thing, it’s not that large. Two, with added weight comes added durability. This stock is quite highly recommended for anyone that has an AR at their disposal.

More details are available on this article.

Hi all, I love to know your feedback and would love writing report. Have an excellent time & God Bless the USA!

Gun Magazine Articles: Business Advertisements?

Most men dream of having a magic gun – one which rises to any event, is ready for instant action any time they want to use it, whose aim is true and may be sure to fire not merely once, but if needed, several times.

Here is the James Bond-like image that links penises.. and weapons. Kiss-Kiss, Bang-Bang. This is simply not only the phallo-centric imagination in Ian Fleming stories. It’s the shared imagery of women and men, strength and equating effectiveness, desire and sexual satisfaction. Bond could take his manly approach to the heart of the villain’s woman, and save-the World in his time. Gender sirens like Mae West ask their suitors, ‘Is that a PMAG in your pocket, or are you just glad to see me?’

Our Mother Earth alas had other plans. She developed sex for procreation as opposed to recreation, and she often disarmed him, when a man was past his reproductive best-by time. This is particularly the case since with Hormone Replacement Therapy women are experiencing ‘Post-Menopausal Zest.’ They are preserving their appeal and strength, along with expectations of an active sex life, within their fifties, sixties and even seventies and beyond. What was considered only being an occupational hazard for ageing roués and rakes, has become a problem for nearly all men in middle and later life.

If that is the right word, of sexual gymnasts, the writer Frank Harris, this decline in effectiveness was well referred to as long ago as 1925 by one-of the longest standing. In his five volume autobiography ‘My Life and Loves’, he describes his lower in firepower with age.

‘My Creator – when I was totally without experience and had only entered my teenagers, gave me, so to speak, a magazine gun of gender, and hardly had I learned its use and pleasure when he took it away from me forever, and gave me in its place a double-barrelled gun: after a few years, he took that away and gave me a single-barrelled gun with which I was forced to content myself for the best part of my life.’

‘Towards the end the old single-barrel begun to show signs of use and age: sometimes it would stop too early, sometimes it missed fire and shamed me, do what I would.’

‘I want to teach youngsters how to use their magazine gun of sex so that it might last for years, and when they come to the double-barrel, how to get such care that the nice tool will do them liege service directly into their sixties, and the single-barrel will then give them pleasure as much as three score years and ten.’

However, medical science has come up with two new developments which contain the promise of changing this eternal sexual history of even the most naturally well maintained and rendered of men.

HRT for Men

The very first of these is Hormone Replacement therapy for men with testosterone, the theory that I introduced in my previous book, Testosterone Revolution. As well as overcoming the lack of libido and energy often experienced by men going through the male menopause or andropause, it can restore strength in the vast majority of cases.

In over two thousand such men I’ve learned in London over the past 10 years, in 65% erections increased using the male HRT treatment alone to the level where sex was adequate. In the remaining, the party now most-likely to receive extra profit from what I call the unholy trinity, Viagra, Levitra and Cialis restored sufficient erectile function in 90-95%, and in only one was treatment required with practices including the now thankfully mostly superseded penile injections.

Viagra – A Huge Leap for Mankind

In the treatment of erectile dysfunction (E.D.) Viagra is, as described two-years ago in my book, ‘a huge leap for mankind.’ Probably more men care about putting the manhood straight back in the man than putting a man on the moon. In fact, this drug can put a person and woman on the moon. by closing the dreaded ED and the misery this causes.

In terms of media attention, this indicates to get found the public imagination equally as much, and not really NASA’s victory made the address of the two American publications Time and Business week simultaneously.

Does it deserve this level of hype? There are compelling reasons for thinking it does, both as an important advance in an extended neglected area of men’s health, and while the official birth of a ‘New Era of Life style Drugs.’

Testosterone is the hormonal basis of desire in both men and women, and if it’s low, so may be the libido. It is the desire and sexual pleasure that generates the nitric oxide that increases lubrication and vaginal blood-flow in both sexes, creating erections in the male, and by reducing its break-down, Viagra stretches these responses as do the alternatives Levitra and Cialis. That is why both in theory and in practice the 2 are better together, as my clinical experience at the the Centre for Men’s Health in Harley Street is demonstrating again and again.

The first results of work using the two together in another 100 men as noted in chapter five, suggests not really a higher response rate, but that Viagra works at lower doses, and longer and stronger with extra testosterone. Another reason behind combining these treatments is that, so far as we know, Viagra has none-of the preventive medical advantages of male HRT with testosterone, particularly to one’s heart and blood circulation, muscles and bones.

Like oestrogens, testosterone has been proven to improve nitric oxide production in blood vessels all around the body, which as in the penis relaxes them and increases blood flow. That is more likely to be important in slowing aging changes in both heart and brain.

The entire matter of nitric oxide and its many essential actions in the human body is a very interesting and in every sense of the term ‘attractive’ area of medical research. It was only just over two decades ago that a number of its many tasks were first discovered, and already it’s the goal for-a billion-dollar pharmaceutical hands race.

More information would be found here.

With Viagra, Pfizer claimed the first prize, but other closely related drugs such as for example Levitra and Cialis can sell equally well. There are more glittering rewards for people who can copy or improve on this great task of molecular design which made sure-fire erections possible for previously impotent men, the PMAG in stock of these goals.

Erectile Dysfunction and the Gun

Most men dream of getting a gun – the one that rises to any event, is ready for instant action any time they wish to utilize it, whose goal is true and can be sure to fire not merely once, but if needed, many times.

Here is the James Bond-like image that links penises.. and weapons. Kiss-Kiss, Bang-Bang. This is not just the phallo-centric imagination in Ian Fleming stories. It is the shared imagery of women and men, energy and equating efficiency, desire and sexual pleasure. Relationship could take his manly solution to one’s heart of the villain’s person, and save-the World in his time. Gender sirens like Mae West ask their suitors, ‘Is the fact that a PMAG in your pocket, or are you just glad to see me?’

Mother Nature alas had other plans. She developed sex for procreation rather than entertainment, and whenever a man was past his reproductive best-by time, she frequently disarmed him. This is particularly the case given that with Hormone Replacement Therapy girls are experiencing ‘Post-Menopausal Zest.’ They are preserving their charm and strength, together with expectations of an active sex life, to their sixties, sixties and even seventies and beyond. What was considered only being an occupational hazard for aging roués and rakes, has become a problem for nearly all men in middle and later life.

If that’s the correct word, of sexual gymnasts, the writer Frank Harris, this decline in effectiveness was well described as long ago as 1925 by one of the best standing. In his five volume autobiography ‘My Life and Loves’, he describes his decrease in firepower with age.

‘My Creator – when I was wholly without experience and had only entered my teenagers, gave me, so to speak, a magazine gun of gender, and barely had I discovered its use and enjoyment when he took it away from me forever, and gave me in its place a double-barrelled gun: after having a few years, he took that away and gave me a single-barrelled gun with which I was forced to content myself for the best part of my life.’

‘Towards the end the old single-barrel began to show signs of use and age: sometimes it’d set off too early, sometimes it missed fire and shamed me, do what I would.’

‘I need to teach youths how to use their magazine gun of sex so that it might last for years, and once they come to the double-barrel, how to get such care that the great system will do them liege service right into their sixties, and the single-barrel will then give them pleasure up to three score years and ten.’

But, medical science has come up with two new developments which contain the promise of changing this eternal sexual history of even the most naturally well maintained and rendered of men.

HRT for Men

The very first of these is Hormone Replacement treatment for men with testosterone, the concept that I presented in my previous book, Testosterone Revolution. Along with overcoming the lack of energy and libido often experienced by men going through the male menopause or andropause, it may restore efficiency in the majority of cases.

In over two thousand such men I have studied in London over the past 10 years, in 65% erections improved with the male HRT treatment alone to the stage where sex was adequate. In the rest, the group now most-likely to receive additional profit from what I call the unholy trinity, Viagra, Levitra and Cialis restored acceptable erectile function in 90-95%, and in only one was treatment required with methods such as the now fortunately generally replaced penile injections.

Viagra – A Huge Leap for Mankind

In the treating erectile dysfunction (E.D.) Viagra is, as described two-years ago in my book, ‘a giant leap for mankind.’ Probably more men care about putting the manhood back in the man than putting a man on the moon. In reality, this drug can put a guy and woman within the moon. by ending the misery this causes. and the dreaded ED

In terms of media attention, it seems to get caught the public imagination just as much, and not NASA’s triumph made the cover of the two American magazines Time and Business week simultaneously.

Does it deserve this level of hype? There are compelling reasons for believing it can, both as a major advance in a lengthy neglected area of men’s health, and because the official start of a ‘New Era of Lifestyle Drugs.’

Testosterone is the basis of need in both men and women, and if it’s low, so is the libido. It’s the desire and sexual excitement that provides the nitric oxide that increases lubrication and genital blood flow in both sexes, making erections in the male, and by slowing its breakdown, Viagra stretches these responses as do the choices Levitra and Cialis. That is why both in theory and in practice the 2 work better together, as my clinical experience at the the Centre for Men’s Health in Harley Street is showing again and again.

The first results of work utilizing the two together in another 10-0 men as described in chapter five, suggests not only a higher reaction rate, but that Viagra works at lower doses, and longer and stronger with additional testosterone. Another reason behind combining these solutions is that, in terms of we know, Viagra has none-of the preventive medical benefits of male HRT with testosterone, particularly to one’s heart and blood supply, muscles and bones.

Like oestrogens, testosterone has recently been shown to boost nitric oxide production in blood vessels all around the body, which as in the penis relaxes them and increases blood flow. This is likely to be impor-tant in slowing aging changes in both heart and brain.

The entire issue of nitric oxide and its many important measures in the body can be a very exciting and in every sense of the term ‘hot’ area of medical research. It was only over twenty years ago that a few of its many functions were first found, and already it’s the target to get a billion-dollar pharmaceutical arms race.

More information is found on this article.

With Viagra, Pfizer said the initial prize, but other closely related drugs such as Cialis and Levitra are available equally well. You’ll find more glittering rewards for people who can copy or improve on this great feat of molecular design which made sure-fire erections possible for previously impotent men, the PMAGs in stock of these goals.

Magpul Companies – Why You Need To Trust Them and What They Could Offer You

A magazine is feeding system and the storage area for ammunition in a firearm which is attached to a repeating firearm. The magazine runs by switching the tubes saved inside into a spot that it could be fed into the chamber to make impact, when a gun dish fires a gun. A removable magazine is usually called a ‘clip’ and are intensely monitored by gun get a grip on laws because it is an integrated element of most repeating firearm.

Gun magazines are manufactured in many shapes and sizes including bolt-action show rifles, that hold only a few rounds to machine guns that can hold countless rounds. The guns that recognize a large number of magazine frequently use a box or drum magazine and some handguns may also feed from both publications and devices. The most widely used of magazine in modern guns are the removable box type publications. This capsule in this magazine is situated in either the order in a staggered zig zag type or with each topic placed one above another. When the gun begins to fire, then your cartridges are changed to the very best of-the magazine by yet another fan driven by spring pressure to either a side by side or a single feed position.

Specific gun publications including the single or multiple tubular magazine are often available on most lever action rifles, and pump action shotguns whether round or flat nose. These publications keep tubes end to end inside a spring-loaded tube, running parallel to the barrel or in the buttstock and is normally fixed for the firearm when used. The key problem with tubular publications was that after the bullet suggestion made contact with the primer of the container before it throughout recoil, it would quite often find fire-which made it very risky to use so it was made obsolete within armed forces once the pointed ‘splitzer’ bullets were introduced.

There’s also round developed magazines such as drum and rotary magazines that enable you to put more bullets inside than box magazines. Drum magazines are placed primarily in light devices guns such as the Heckler & Koch MG36, but these magazines are complex and more unreliable. In some drum magazines, the round chamber forces the loose rounds in to an exit slot while the cartridge is located parallel to the axis of rotation. When the magazine is filled, then a wound spring forces the partition against the models. A single staggered order is forced with a fan via a circular path.

More details is available on this website.

From there the units enter the vertical riser both from a single or combined drums. Other types of publications contain, Pan and Helical. There are also specific large capacity magazines that were built to hold a lot more cartridges that the conventional capacity but these magazines are forbidden. Magazine capacity is usually limited by the look of the gun, like for example central, tubular, or circular publications. Lots of guns and gun magazines are regarded as ‘high-capacity’ by PMAGs in stock get a grip on laws are truly the factory standard magazines actually made for use with their respective firearms.